SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
CCTEB India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.19469/2022 (exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 6427/2022 & CM APPL. 19468/2022(stay)

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the Assessment Order dated 31st March, 2022, passed under Section 143 (3) read with Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') for Assessment Year 2020-21.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent No.1 while passing the said impugned order, made additions totalling to Rs.100,89,12,380/-primarily on the ground that the petitioner had failed to file reply to the show cause notice issued by the respondent No.1 on 22nd March, 2022 around midnight. He states that the said show cause notice was served upon the petitioner via e-mail asking the petitioner to respond to said notice by 3:45 pm on the very next day, i.e. 23rd March, 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by way of the said show cause notice running into 92 pages, the petitioner was directed to provide various documents for the first time during the assessment proceedings. He states that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top