Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, ASHA MENON
Vikash – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay application allowed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's medical fitness examined differently. (Para 6 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. review petition based on conflicting medical opinions. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court finds no merit in the review. (Para 9 , 10 , 13) |
| 5. review petition dismissed. (Para 14) |
CM APPL. 20796/2022 (exemption)
1. The application is allowed, subject to just exceptions.
2. The application is accordingly disposed of.
CM APPL. 20795/2022 (condonation of delay)
3. By way of the present application, petitioner is seeking condonation of delay of 88 days in filing the review petition in W.P.(C) No.2333/2020.
4. In view of the reasons stated in the application and various orders passed by this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we hereby condone the delay of 88 days in filing the review petition.
5. Application is allowed and disposed of.
REV. PET. 122/2022
6. Present review petition has been filed under Order XLVII Rules 1 & 2 CPC seeking review of order dated 10.11.2020 passed in W.P.(C) 2333/2020 as the said petition was dismissed on delay and latches but not on merit.
7. The case of the review petitioner is that he was f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
