Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Tommorrowland Limited – Appellant
Versus
Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corpn. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes arise from underwriting agreements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of public issue processing. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. underwriter obligations are specified. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. regulatory involvement affects subscription. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. arbitration process and its implications. (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. court's authority to extend arbitration timeline. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. assessing damages in arbitration awards. (Para 28 , 29 , 31) |
| 8. evaluation of evidence in arbitration decisions. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. arguments to challenge arbitration award. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 10. plaintiff's obligations and responsibilities. (Para 46 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 11. reassessment of damages and interests. (Para 90 , 91 , 92) |
| 12. defendant's counterarguments on damages. (Para 93 , 94 , 95 , 96) |
| 13. court's final order and decree. (Para 110 , 112 , 113 , 114) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. The present suit is one of 27 connected suits, all of which relate to disputes between the Plaintiff - M/s MS Shoes East Ltd. (now known as Tommorrowland Limited) and various Defendants/Respondents who were Underwriters of a public issue brought out by the Plaintiff-Company i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
