Rekha Dutt (Dr.) vs Employees State Inusrance Corporation

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAJMI WAZIRI, SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Rekha Dutt (Dr.) – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Inusrance Corporation – Respondent

Table of Content
1. applicant applied for medical position. (Para 1)
2. petitioner meets eligibility criterion of experience. (Para 2 , 4)
3. respondents dispute experience qualification. (Para 3 , 5)
4. court emphasizes 'either/or' criteria for selection. (Para 6 , 10 , 11)
5. experience meeting minimum requirement established. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
6. court criticizes unjust observations on research papers. (Para 12 , 14)
7. unjustified observations set aside. (Para 15)
8. petition disposed with conclusion. (Para 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT

Najmi Waziri, J. (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).

1. The respondents issued an Advertisement in October 2015, proposing to fill up various posts in the field of Medicine. One such post was Associate Professor at Community Medicine in ESIC Medical College at Joka, Kolkata (West Bengal). The applicant uploaded her application and was invited for an interview. The results of the examination were declared on 24.05.2016. The name of the applicant did not figure therein. After unsuccessfully undertaking some correspondence with the respondents, the applicant filed this O.A.

2. The applicant contends that she fulf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTNAJMI WAZIRI, SWARANA KANTA SHARMARekha Dutt (Dr.) – AppellantVersusEmployees State Inusrance Corporation – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAJMI WAZIRI, SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Rekha Dutt (Dr.) – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Inusrance Corporation – Respondent