SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Vishal Balguer – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background and details of the incident (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments for bail and discrepancies in evidence (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's considerations regarding bail application (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

ORDER

Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. This is an application filed under Section 439 Cr.PC for grant of bail in FIR No.1187/2015 registered at Police Station Hauz Khas under Sections 302/308/201/212/34 IPC.

2. In brief, as per the case of the Prosecution, the FIR was registered on the complaint of Rohit Bansal, who alleged that in the intervening night of 21/22.10.2015, he along with his friends namely Vineet, Sonu, Rupesh and Monu had visited Shanghai-30 Bar and Restaurant, E-Block Market, Hauz Khas. About 12:30 AM, a quarrel took place between the complainant and accused party on the issue of dancing on the floor in the Bar which was sorted out by the bouncers. Thereafter, the complainant along with his friends left the Bar. Meanwhile, since the complainant realized that he had forgotten his mobile phone in Shanghai Bar, he along with his friends returned back and saw that the persons who had clashed with him in the Bar were standing near the Bar blocking his way. A quarrel took plac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top