Salek Chand Jain vs Ministry of Social Justice

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Salek Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Social Justice – Respondent

Table of Content
1. prayers for upliftment of de-notified tribes. (Para 1)
2. neglect of de-notified tribes and need for inclusion. (Para 2)
3. government schemes for de-notified tribes' welfare. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
4. petitioner's demands addressed by government actions. (Para 7)
5. writ petition disposed as no further orders needed. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Article 14, 21, 16(4), 38, 46 of the Constitution of India has been filed with the following prayers:

"a) To make proper scheme and implementation so that the each and every member of the de-notified nomadic and semi-nomadic tribes enjoy the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution of India.

b) To form the de-notified nomadic and seminomadic tribes making special categories in the schedule tribe category of the Constitution of India giving them special facilities for their upliftment.

c) To make schemes and proposals to bring the de-notified nomadic and semi-nomadic tribes in the mainstream of the country.

d) To make schemes and proposals for the basic education of the de-notified nomadic and semi-nomadic tribes as provided in the Constitution

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASADSalek Chand Jain – AppellantVersusMinistry of Social Justice – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Salek Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Social Justice – Respondent