SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Firoz Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ("the learned SCDRC") to decide FA 546/2019 expeditiously preferably on day-to-day basis and adjudicate the appeal on merits.

2. The prayer clause in this petition reads thus:

    "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to:

    (a) direct the Respondent No. 1 to expeditiously decide the appeal of the Petitioner being Appeal No.546 of 2019 titled Firoz Ahmad Vs Paramount Villas Pvt. Ltd., preferably within one month from the date of order/direction issued by this Hon'ble High Court;

    (b) direct the Respondent No. 2 to expeditiously decide the Execution Application of the Petitioner being Execution Application No.44 of 2016 titled Firoz Ahmad Vs Paramount Villas Pvt. Ltd., preferably within one month from the date of adjudication of the Appeal No. 546 of2019 by the Respondent No.1;

    (c) direct all the Respondents to complete the process of execution of the order dated 28.09.2015 in First Appeal No. 960 of 2014 passed by the Respondent No.1 without any interference or modification in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top