Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Amit Nehra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for reassignment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. delay in disciplinary proceedings and family crisis. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. challenge to fresh attachment order. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's directive and conclusion. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
1. By way of the CM APPL. 30288/2022, applicant -petitioner seeks to direct the respondents to send back the petitioner to his unit 160 Bn BSF.
2. The petitioner appearing in person submits that he was first attached to 182 Bn BSF in November 2020 and then was de-attached on disciplinary ground from 182 Bn to 29 Bn BSF vide Signal No. R/3224 dated 28.03.2022 wherein it was clearly mentioned that his attachment to 29 Bn BSF is for a period of two months only and that no further extension will be granted and that same was rendered futile ab-initio as all the witnesses against the petitioner belonged to 93 Bn of BSF which had already moved to Gujarat much before, i.e. around July, 2021 itself.
3. He submits that the pending disciplinary action against the petitioner can be completed anywhere and keeping him attached in Manipur will subject him to unnecessary financial constraint as he is not getting allowances
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
