SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Gurdeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jaspal Kaur – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

CM No.31027/2022 (Exemption)

Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

FAO (OS) (COMM) 176/2022 and CM APPL. 31028/2022 (stay)

1. Appellant impugns judgment dated 24.02.2022 whereby the petition filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act') impugning the award dated 13.05.2015 has been dismissed.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant commenced his submissions by candidly referring to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited, (2022)1 SCC 131 wherein the Supreme Court has clarified the scope of examination under Sections 34 and 37 of the Act in the following terms:

    "28. This Court has in several other judgments interpreted Section 34 of the 1996 Act to stress on the restraint to be shown by Courts while examining the validity of the arbitral awards. The limited grounds available to Courts for annulment of arbitral awards are well known to legally trained minds. However, the difficulty arises in applying the well-established principles for interference to the facts of each ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top