SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
S.B. Ram – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of petition for efficiency bar benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. respondent's arguments against petition. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's reasoning on the commission's recommendations. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. conclusion on merits of the petition. (Para 14)
5. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 15 , 16)

ORDER

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)--The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to implement the recommendations dated 23rd October 2008 of the National Commission for Schedule Castes and to grant the petitioner all benefits of arrears of dues of Efficiency Bar and promotions from due dates.

2. The brief background of the case leading up to the filing of instant petition is as follows:

i. The petitioner joined Central Warehousing Corporation (hereinafter "Corporation") as Junior Superintendent on 13th August 1971 and was promoted to the post of Superintendent w.e.f. 8th July 1985 and thereafter, as Storage and Inspection Officer w.e.f. 8th June 2001.

ii. It is the case of the petitioner that he was denied his Effici

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top