JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. :

1. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner/workman challenging the impugned award dated 30.09.2019 passed in LID No.308/2016 by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Rouse Avenue District Court, New Delhi, titled `Prince Mourya vs. M/s Cadila Healthcare Limited', whereby the learned labour court on the basis of the claim petition and the reply filed by the management, framed the following issues:

1 Whether the services of workman have been terminated by the management illegally/unjustifiably on 03.08.2015 in violation of provisions of Section 25 F, G & H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? If so, to what effect and to what relief workman is entitled to? OPW

2 Whether the workman has himself resigned from the services of the management on 24.07.2015? OPM

3 Relief.

2. Learned Labour Court after considering the entire material on record inter alia held that the petitioner had not been able to prove that his services were terminated by the management illegally and unjustifiably in violation of provisions of section 25 F, G and H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Learned labour court has also returned a finding that t