Microsoft Corporation vs Tech Heracles OPC Private Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Microsoft Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Tech Heracles OPC Private Limited – Respondent

Table of Content
1. conclusion and order issued by the court. (Para 1 , 4 , 13)
2. initial orders and hearing dates. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. service of summons on foreign defendants. (Para 6 , 7)
4. procedural guidelines for serving documents abroad. (Para 8 , 9)
5. role of ministry of law and justice in service processes. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

ORDER

I.A. 2188/2022 (Exemption from filing originals, certified copies, affirmed affidavits, notarised affidavits, physical signatures, etc.)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Plaintiffs shall file the originals documents, which are in their possession, within two weeks days from today.

3. Duly signed, affirmed and notarized affidavits be filed within two weeks from today.

4. Accordingly, application stands disposed of.

CS(COMM) 276/2021

5. Issue fresh summons to Defendant No.4, returnable on 07.07.2022.

I.A.2189/2022 (by the Plaintiffs under Order V Rules 25 and 26 r/w S. 151 CPC seeking service of summons on Defendant No. 4)

6. Present application has been preferred by the Plaintiffs seeking service of summons on Defendant No.4, located in Canada, through the Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTJYOTI SINGHMicrosoft Corporation – AppellantVersusTech Heracles OPC Private Limited – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Microsoft Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Tech Heracles OPC Private Limited – Respondent