SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Pankaj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenges facing newly enrolled advocates (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. limits of court jurisdiction over stipends (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's appeal for financial provisions (Para 10 , 11)
4. chamber allotment rules and junior advocates (Para 12)
5. dismissal of the public interest litigation (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed as a Public Interest Litigation with the following prayers:

    "a) Honourable court may issue the writ of mandamus nature directing R1 and R2 to consider the financial difficulties to the all concerned and to provide the financial assistance of Rs.5000 to the petitioner and newly enrolled advocates in Bar council of delhi during his initial year of practice;

    b) Honourable court may pass an direction for making rules for chamber/co-working space allotment by creating equal opportunity to the newly enrolled advocates;

    c) Honourable court may be pleased to pass any other order, judgement in the interest of justice as deems fit."

2. The Petitioner, who is 29 years of age, is a young advocate, who has enrolled himself in the Bar Council of Delhi and cle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top