DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Pankaj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges facing newly enrolled advocates (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. limits of court jurisdiction over stipends (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's appeal for financial provisions (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. chamber allotment rules and junior advocates (Para 12) |
| 5. dismissal of the public interest litigation (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
Subramonium Prasad, J. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed as a Public Interest Litigation with the following prayers:
"a) Honourable court may issue the writ of mandamus nature directing R1 and R2 to consider the financial difficulties to the all concerned and to provide the financial assistance of Rs.5000 to the petitioner and newly enrolled advocates in Bar council of delhi during his initial year of practice;
b) Honourable court may pass an direction for making rules for chamber/co-working space allotment by creating equal opportunity to the newly enrolled advocates;
c) Honourable court may be pleased to pass any other order, judgement in the interest of justice as deems fit."
2. The Petitioner, who is 29 years of age, is a young advocate, who has enrolled himself in the Bar Council of Delhi and cle
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.