SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Alok Malani – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. revisional court order on charges (Para 1)
2. arguments on petitioner's defense (Para 2 , 3)
3. observations on prima facie evidence (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. dismissal of the petition (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

1. This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 25.08.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-05, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby, the Revisional Court has found that charge for offence punishable under Sections 406 IPC and 420 of the IPC cannot go together, and, therefore quashed the charge under Section 406 of the IPC and has found that petitioner and other accused persons are liable to be prosecuted for offences punishable under Sections 420/468/471/34 IPC.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, at the outset, submits that there has been delay in filing the instant petition and has given various reasons, in the petition. According to him, against the impugned order, his father Mohan Malani filed the revision petition; however, on account of his death, the said revision petition was to be withdrawn and the petitioner has filed the instant revision petition.

3. Learned counsel appear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top