DELHI HIGH COURT
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Alok Malani – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revisional court order on charges (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments on petitioner's defense (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. observations on prima facie evidence (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. dismissal of the petition (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
1. This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 25.08.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-05, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby, the Revisional Court has found that charge for offence punishable under Sections 406 IPC and 420 of the IPC cannot go together, and, therefore quashed the charge under Section 406 of the IPC and has found that petitioner and other accused persons are liable to be prosecuted for offences punishable under Sections 420/468/471/34 IPC.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, at the outset, submits that there has been delay in filing the instant petition and has given various reasons, in the petition. According to him, against the impugned order, his father Mohan Malani filed the revision petition; however, on account of his death, the said revision petition was to be withdrawn and the petitioner has filed the instant revision petition.
3. Learned counsel appear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.