Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Vipin Garg – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Garg – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. limited notice issued for petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petition challenges refusal to accept written statement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observes procedural fairness concerns. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. opportunity granted to petitioners for extension. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. order quashed; petitioners allowed to file application. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
1. In view of the limited nature of the controversy involved, short notice had been issued in the present petition on 16th September 2022, returnable today with the specific observation that the matter would be taken up and decided today.
2. Despite the matter having been called out twice, there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent. I have accordingly heard Mr. Sumit Rajput, learned Counsel for the petitioners and have perused the record.
3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails order dated 17th August 2022 passed by the learned Additional District Judge ("the learned ADJ") in CS DJ 577/2021 (Rajesh Garg v. Vipin Garg). By the said order, the learned ADJ has refused to take on record the written statement filed by the petitioners, as the defendant in the suit, on 1st June 2022.
4. Summon
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
