Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Roopa – Appellant
Versus
Abhijeet Sangwan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to past order under article 227. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. delay in filing petition explained by counsel. (Para 3) |
| 3. court observes on laches and delay. (Para 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 4. inordinate delay eviscerates right to relief. (Para 6) |
| 5. petition dismissed; no costs awarded. (Para 8 , 9) |
1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 15th October 2019, passed by the learned Additional District Judge (learned ADJ) adjudicating the application of the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the CPC) in CS 1125/2018 (Abhijeet Sangwan v. Roopa), whereby the learned ADJ has rejected the said application.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner on or around 29th July 2022.
3. To a query from the Court, as to why this Court should entertain such a challenge when nearly 3 years after the order under challenge have passed, Mr. Anilendra Kant Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that (i) the impugned order was passed on the ground that by the proposed amendment, the petitioner was seeking to wriggle out of certain admissions made in the written statement file
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
