SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Ambarnuj Finance and Investment Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. assessee's arguments against ao's rectification order. (Para 8 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. court's observations on the validity of the ao's order. (Para 16 , 18 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 30)
4. ratio decidendi regarding mistake apparent on record. (Para 19 , 25 , 28 , 31)
5. final conclusion and order on the petition. (Para 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J.:

1. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner, Assessee, seeking quashing of the rectification order dated 15th February, 2021, passed by the Respondent during the consideration of the Assessee's application for settlement of disputed tax under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (`Act of 2020').

2. The Assessee is also seeking a direction to the Respondent No. 1 to reconsider its application for settlement of disputed tax under the Act of 2020, for the Assessment Year (`AY') 2017-18.

3. The Assessee filed its Return of Income (`ROI') on 2nd November, 2017, and thereafter, filed its revised return on 14th May, 2018, both times declaring an income of NIL, as there was business loss in the AY 2017-18.

4. The Assessing Offi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top