Ashok @ Kullu vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, ANISH DAYAL
Ashok @ Kullu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. appellants challenge convictions and sentences. (Para 1)
2. defense argues lack of intent and provocation. (Para 2)
3. prosecution presents eyewitness testimony. (Para 3 , 4)
4. details of the incident and medical findings. (Para 5 , 6)
5. witness statements indicate enmity. (Para 8 , 9)
6. court reflects on the nature and intent of the act. (Para 10)
7. reference to prior case law for context. (Para 11)
8. court modifies charge based on findings. (Para 12)
9. final decision and sentence modifications. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. (Oral)--By the present appeals, the appellants challenge the impugned judgment dated 26th April, 2019 convicting them for offences punishable under Section 302/34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 30th April, 2019 directing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- each in default whereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months each.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that even as per the statement of the sisters of the deceased, the deceased was having an evil eye on the sister and wife of the appellant Sanjay due to which there was enmity. He states that enmity is a double edg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMUKTA GUPTA, ANISH DAYALAshok @ Kullu – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA, ANISH DAYAL
Ashok @ Kullu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent