DELHI HIGH COURT
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Geeta @ Reeta Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Mishra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of domestic violence case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding maintenance inadequacy. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis on maintenance calculation. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. final order modifying maintenance amount. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
1. This revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, (Cr.P.C.) is directed against impugned judgment dated 31.07.2019, passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari (West) Courts in CA No.268/2018 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (DV Act, 2005) against the order dated 18.10.2018, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-02, West, Delhi, rejecting application of the petitioner under Section 12 of the DV Act, 2005, has been allowed in part.
2. A detailed narration of the facts is not necessary for the reason that the petitioner confines her submissions only to the extent of inadequacy of the maintenance awarded in her favour by the court below. However, some of the facts relevant for adjudication of the issue raised would be referred as and when they are require
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.