SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
State (GNCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for parole due to long incarceration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. examination of parole eligibility under rule 1212. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. consideration of public interest in granting parole. (Para 6 , 7)
4. rationale behind parole as a rehabilitative tool. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. (Oral)--Writ Petition has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or orders thereby directing the respondent/competent authority to release the petitioner with immediate effect on parole for a period of four weeks as per order dated 10.03.2022 for re-establishing social ties with family and the society.

2. In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, he is in custody since 10.09.2009 and has undergone about 12 years in imprisonment out of the total sentence for 20 years without remission, in FIR No.206/2009, under Section 302/34 IPC, PS Adarsh Nagar. Further the petitioner is claimed to have an excellent record in jail, but despite order dated 10.03.2022, granting parole to the petitioner by Home (General) Department, D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top