DELHI HIGH COURT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
State (GNCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for parole due to long incarceration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. examination of parole eligibility under rule 1212. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. consideration of public interest in granting parole. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. rationale behind parole as a rehabilitative tool. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. (Oral)--Writ Petition has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or orders thereby directing the respondent/competent authority to release the petitioner with immediate effect on parole for a period of four weeks as per order dated 10.03.2022 for re-establishing social ties with family and the society.
2. In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, he is in custody since 10.09.2009 and has undergone about 12 years in imprisonment out of the total sentence for 20 years without remission, in FIR No.206/2009, under Section 302/34 IPC, PS Adarsh Nagar. Further the petitioner is claimed to have an excellent record in jail, but despite order dated 10.03.2022, granting parole to the petitioner by Home (General) Department, D
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.