SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Satish Chandra Sharma, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
Skipper Properties Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
Sunrise Property Developers Private Limited - Respondent
RFA(OS)(COMM) 1 of 2022 & CM Appls. 18826 of 2022, 18827 of 2022
Decided On : 16-11-2022




Clear admissions in a written statement can establish liability under a lease agreement, enforceable despite limitation defenses when supported by contract provisions for joint liability of directors.

Headnote:(A) Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Section 13(1A); Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 131 - Appeal against order and part decree concerning lease agreement - Appellant-lessor failed to meet contractual obligations leading to a breach of agreement - Respondent-lessee entitled to recover security deposit with interest. (Paras 1, 24, 32)

(B) Personal Liability - Directors' joint and several liability outlined in contractual terms - Admissions in written statement substantiate liability despite limitation objections - Clear admissions enforceable under Section 25(3) of Indian Contract Act, 1872. (Paras 20, 30)

Facts of the case:
The suit involved a lease agreement for commercial premises wherein the lessor failed to complete construction by the agreed date, leading the lessee to terminate the lease and seek the recovery of the paid amount inclusive of interest and damages. (Paras 5, 16)

Findings of Court:
The court found the lessor liable for the payment of Rs.46,47,394/- with interest at 12% per annum as agreed due to failure to meet contractual terms. (Paras 19, 32)

Issues: Whether the suit was barred by limitation and whether the directors could be held personally liable as per lease agreement terms. (Paras 25, 30)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that clear admissions in the written statement reflected an unequivocal intention to be bound and qualified the directors' liability under the lease agreement, affirming the lower court's decision. (Paras 24, 32)

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. lease agreement terms and establishment (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. lessee's financial obligations and rights (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. nature of lease violations and claims (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. judicial findings on admissions and liabilities (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
5. court's conclusions on personal liability (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
6. review petition outcomes (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
7. arguments on limitation and breaches (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
8. resolution on personal liability of directors (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
9. final decree and appeal dismissal (Para 32 , 33 , 34)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. The present Appeal has been filed under Section 13(1A), Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 131 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 against the order and part decree passed by the Ld. Single Judge in CS (OS) (COMM) 387/2019 and the order passed in the Review Petition No. 18/2020 in CS (OS) (COMM) 387/2019.

2. The facts leading up to the filing of this Appeal are that the Appellant No. 1/Skipper Properties/Appellant-lessor is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, which operates in the domain of constructing and developing commercial retail spaces/properties. The Appellant-lessor is the absolute owner of the premises in dispute.

3. The Appellant-lessor entered into a lease agreement with the respondent-lessee for the premises at No. 26, Ground Floor, Janak Cineplex located inside Plot No. 3, Community Center, Block-C, Janak Puri, New Delhi 110058, with a carpet area of 1100 sq ft. (hereinafter referred to as `the Premises') on 31.01.2015, for a period of 15 years with applicable rent at the rate of Rs.312 per square feet of super area (being 2000 square feet), with an increment of 10% per annum after 3 years. Clause 16 stipulates the rent commencement period as being the 121steither from the date the lessee is in receipt of the Completion Certificate issued by the DDA/MCD, or on the date of completion of the work order as stipulated in clauses 10 and 11, whichever date would be later.

4. Pursuant to the requirements of clauses 5 and 6, the Respondent-lessee deposited Rs.37,44,000/- in lieu of refundable and interest free security deposit, and Rs.74,88,000/- as advance rent for a period of 15 years, respectively. The combined total of these payments is Rs.1,12,32,000/-. The Respondent-lessee's payment of the aforestated amount is recorded in Clause 7, while Clause 15 states that the lessee is entitled to obtain a refund of the interest free and refundable security deposit at any time, subject to payment of three month's rent, or after having served a notice period of 3 months. The relevant clauses of the lease agreement are reproduced below for reference:

    Clause 5. The Lease Rent shall begin after the 120 Days Rent Free Period from the date of receiving of completion certificate from DDA/MCD by the Lessor or Completion of Lessor's Scope of Work, which ever is later. As promised by Lessor the same will be done on or before 31 December 2015.

    6. That the LESSEE has paid a REFUNDABLE & INTEREST FREE Security Deposit Rs.37,44,000/- (Rupees Thirty Seven Lacs Forty Four Thousand Only) vide cheque No. 880002 drawn on PNB Prashant Vihar Branch to the LESSOR, which is refundable on or before the time of vacating the premises and handing over the peaceful vacant possession of the Leased Premises.

    That the LESSEE has also paid Advance Rent Rs.74,88,000/- (Rupees Seventy Four Lacs Eighty Eight Thousand Only) vide cheq N. 880001 drawn on PNB Prashant Vihar Branch, to the LESSOR which shall be adjusted in the first (15) Fifteen Months, after the 120 days Rent Free Period from the date of receiving of completion certificate from DDA/MCD by the Lessor or Completion of Lessor's Scope of Work whichever is later.

    If the Lessor fails to refund the security deposit and advance rent on the date when Lessee will desire to vacate the Leased premises or as per clause 20, the Lessor will be entitled to remain in possessi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top