Paras Khuttan vs Gail India Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Paras Khuttan – Appellant
Versus
Gail India Ltd. – Respondent

Table of Content
1. appellant's employment and resignation details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. arguments regarding application of notice period. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
3. court's observations on resignation policy. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
4. distinction between probationer and employee. (Para 37 , 41 , 42)
5. conclusion ordering refund to the appellant. (Para 38 , 43)

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J.

1. The present Appeal has been filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent, against the impugned judgement/ order dated 10.02.2021 passed by the Learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 4617/2020 titled "Paras Khuttan Vs. Gail India Ltd & Anr.".

2. The facts of the case reveal that the Appellant before this Court applied in pursuant to the advertisement issued by Gas Authority of India Limited (hereinafter referred to as GAIL), and was finally offered an appointment vide letter dated 30.07.2019 to the post of Manager (Law).

3. The Appellant joined as Manager Law on 13.12.2019. While he was on probation, he resigned from the post of Manager (Law). He submitted his resignation on 15.01

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASADParas Khuttan – AppellantVersusGail India Ltd. – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Paras Khuttan – Appellant
Versus
Gail India Ltd. – Respondent