SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Power Infrastructure India – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner has preferred this petition seeking quashing of the impugned order bearing order No. F.No.10/37/2018-NCLAT, dated 21st October, 2022 issued by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). According to ld. Counsel for Petitioner, the said order requires physical filing of documents before the NCLAT, for the purpose of computation of limitation.

3. Pursuant to a reference under Section 419(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, due to disagreement between two members, order dated 27th September, 2022 of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) was pronounced by a third member. The said section reads as:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top