ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region vs Elmech Engineers

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
GAURANG KANTH
ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region – Appellant
Versus
Elmech Engineers – Respondent

Table of Content
1. arguments regarding the trial court's decisions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 13)
2. factual background of supply and payment issues. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court's analysis of rules and implications of delay. (Para 14 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. nature of the provisions under order viii rule 10. (Para 18 , 19)
5. final conclusion and order of the court. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT

Gaurang Kanth, J. (ORAL)

C.M. No. 48910/2022 (Delay of 986 days in filing the appeal)

1. Present application has been filed by the appellants seeking condonation of delay of 986 days in filing the present appeal.

2. For the reasons stated in the present application, the same is allowed and the delay of 986 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.

3. Application stands disposed of.

RFA 568/2022 and C.M. No. 48909/2022 (Stay)

4. The appellants (original defendants) in the present appeal are assailing (i) the impugned judgment and decree dated 31.01.2020 and (ii) order dated 17.12.2019 passed by learned Additional District Judge-04, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Suit No. CS 308/2017 titled Elmech Engineers Vs. Secretary, Department of Agriculture Research & Education & Director General

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTGAURANG KANTHICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region – AppellantVersusElmech Engineers – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
GAURANG KANTH
ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region – Appellant
Versus
Elmech Engineers – Respondent