Tej Ram Dharam Paul vs Om Shiva Products Inc

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Tej Ram Dharam Paul – Appellant
Versus
Om Shiva Products Inc – Respondent

Table of Content
1. plaintiffs established use of trademark. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. defendants contest jurisdiction and delay. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. court evaluates jurisdiction for trademark infringement. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. importance of prior use in trademark claims. (Para 25 , 28 , 29)
5. determination of deceptively similar marks. (Para 30 , 31)
6. prima facie case for injunction established. (Para 32)
7. injunction granted against defendants' trademarks. (Para 33 , 34)
8. encouragement for amicable settlement. (Para 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral):

I.A. No. 20717/2022 (u/Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908)

1. The Plaintiffs have filed the instant suit seeking, inter alia, permanent injunction against passing off and restraining infringement of registered trademark and copyright, delivery up and damages, among other ancillary reliefs. By way of above-captioned application, Plaintiffs seek an interim injunction against Defendants, pending adjudication of the suit. After being afforded an opportunity vide order dated 08th December, 2022, Defendants have filed a reply to the application along

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSANJEEV NARULATej Ram Dharam Paul – AppellantVersusOm Shiva Products Inc – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Tej Ram Dharam Paul – Appellant
Versus
Om Shiva Products Inc – Respondent