SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MINI PUSHKARNA
Umesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Abhay Raj Pandey – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual basis of the loan agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. contract invalid due to legal prohibition. (Para 6 , 9 , 10)
3. chit funds act must be adhered to. (Para 7)
4. appeal dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing]

Mini Pushkarna, J. (ORAL):

1. The present appeal has been filed seeking prayer for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2020 passed by Ld. ADJ, North-West District, Rohini Courts Delhi in suit bearing No. 671/17.

2. The case on behalf of the appellant, who was the plaintiff in the suit, is that the appellant was engaged in the business of transportation under the name and style of M/s Vishal Golden. The father of the respondent herein was running a chit fund. The appellant was a member in chit fund of the respondent and made payments for the said purpose. It is the case of the appellant that the respondent demanded Rs. 3 Lakhs from the appellant herein on 23.06.2016 for treatment of his wife for a short period. The respondent assured that he will return the same after taking next chit in his name. Thus, it is submitted on behalf of the appellant that the appellant gave a friendly

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top