Md. Azam Ansari vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Md. Azam Ansari – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner's service and retirement proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. review petition arguments on dismissal and pension. (Para 8 , 9)
3. litigations and orders related to petitioner’s dismissal. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. finality of dismissal and implications for pension. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
5. review petition dismissed without merits. (Para 22)

JUDGMENT

Neena Bansal Krishna, J. A petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 and 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "CPC, 1908") has been filed for review of the Order dated 04.09.2020 dismissing the W.P. (C) 5973/2020.

2. The petitioner has stated that he was a member of the elite Armed Forces wherein he had put in 171/2 years of service from 15.10.1992 till 17/18.11.2009 before joining the profession of Law. He sought premature retirement from the Service and made various representations dated 12.03.2008, 03.07.2008, 08.10.2008 and also in 2009 to the respondents. He eventually filed the W.P. (C) 8452/2008 seeking voluntary retirement which was listed for final disposal vide Order dated 15.07.2009. In the meanwhile, Armed Forces Tribunal Act was operationalized

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAMd. Azam Ansari – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Md. Azam Ansari – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent