Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
G.C. Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's service history and claims (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on entitlement to gratuity (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. respondent's counterarguments and legal stance (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court's examination of relevant laws (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. conclusion on non-compatibility of services (Para 28 , 29) |
| 6. final decision and dismissal of the petition (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
"(a) call for the relevant records of the respondents;
(b) quash the order F.No.2/4/2008-JA dated 19.1.2012 (Annexure-P impugned), order dated 21.3.2012 (Annexure-P-1 impugned) and order dated 16.4.2012 (Annexure-P-2 impugned) issued by the respondents herein to the extent and has allowed payment of lesser amount of gratuity;
(c) issue an appropriate writ/direction to the respondents to treat the claim of the petitioner for treating service rendered by him in I.A.S. and further with CAT as single spell for the purpose of gratuity in view of the judgement of this H
The main legal point established in the judgment is that re-employment must be substantive, not contractual, to entitle an ex-serviceman to pensionary benefits under the Central Civil Services (Pensi....
Employees are entitled to gratuity per the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 despite other internal regulations, unless an exemption is formally established.
Pension benefits for Members (Judicial) of the Railway Claims Tribunal are governed strictly by applicable statutory rules, and prior legal practice cannot be included as qualifying service.
Employment and Service matter – Pension - While considering Tribunal Rules of 2020, which were notified held Chairpersons, Vice-Chairpersons and Members of Tribunals appointed prior, shall be governe....
The court established that 'other terms and conditions of service' includes pensionary benefits, affirming the petitioner's entitlement under the relevant statutes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that entitlement to notional service for calculating pensionable service is determined by the specific provisions of the relevant pension rules, an....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
