Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Bristol Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Murti Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and ownership details of the suit property. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. allegations of contempt against defendants. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. requirements for invoking contempt proceedings under cpc. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. analysis of disobedience of injunction and rights of the parties. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. dismissal of contempt application for lack of merit. (Para 20) |
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna J.
I.A. 8646/2021 (U/O XXXIX Rule 2A r/w Section 151 of CPC, 1908)
1. An application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the `CPC') has been filed by Plaintiff seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against Defendant No. 2 Sh. Lokesh and Defendant No. 3 Master Mayank through his mother Smt. Kamla and for the attachment of their Suit Property to safeguard the interest and rights of the Plaintiff against the defendants for violation of the "Status Quo" Order dated 05.08.2013.
2. The facts in brief, are that defendant Smt. Murti Devi was married to Sh. Bhagat Singh and from their wedlock, two children namely, Sh. Vijay Pal, son and Smt. Neelam, daughter were born. On the demise of Sh. Bhagat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
