Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Videocon Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ram Raj Bhandari – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as `the Code') read with Order 43 Rule 1 of the Code, assailing the order dated 21st March 2022 passed by the learned trial Court whereby, the plaint of the Appellants herein (hereinafter referred to as `plaintiff companies') was rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code against the Respondents herein.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The facts necessary for the disposal of the present appeal are that the plaintiff companies held 50.21% equity shares in Tirupati Ceramics Limited (hereinafter referred to as `TCL') being 30,00,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each and also have a nominee Director on the Board of said company. TCL was declared as a sick company and consequently, proceedings were pending before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (hereinafter referred to as `BIFR'). The plaintiff companies applied for impleadment as a party to such proceedings to which the Respondent No.1 and 2 through TCL opposed but the BIFR allowed the impleadment application. This order allowing impleadment was challenged by TCL before the Ap
The court reaffirmed that civil courts retain jurisdiction over contested ownership of shares and related disputes, despite the company's dissolution and the provisions of the Companies Act restricti....
The jurisdiction of the Civil Court is not ousted by Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, in cases where the dispute involves allegations of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty by an auditor of a c....
The Companies Act, 2013 bars civil court jurisdiction in company disputes, mandating adjudication by the National Company Law Tribunal.
The court established that the NCLT must conduct a thorough examination of evidence in cases involving rectification of the Register of Members under the Companies Act, 2013.
When a specialized tribunal is empowered by statute to adjudicate disputes involving company oppression and mismanagement, including the authority to grant interim injunctions, the jurisdiction of ci....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the interpretation of the Articles of Association, which falls under the jurisdiction of the civil court, is not within the jurisdiction of th....
Power can only be given by the board of directors of the company in exercise of its statutory power by passing the resolution under the provisions of Section 291 of the Companies Act in favour of a d....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
