SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, TIKKA SINGH
HARYANA CREDIT & LEASING LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KRISHAN MUNJAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Krishan Munjal.

ORDER

S.S. Sandhawalia, President—This appeal is directed against the judgment of District Forum, Hissar, whereby the appellants have been directed to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 5,000/- to the respondent.

2. At the appellate stage, the facts which would call for pointed notice, lie in a narrow compass. M/s. Haryana Credit and Leasing Limited claim to be a prestigious concern, dealing in the financing of cars, motor cycles, scooters and electronics etc. at Hissar. On the 6th December, 1989 they advertised in the local press for arranging the booking of the new Maruti 1000 car with M/s. Maruti Udyog limited against a deposit of Rs. 6,000/- only for each booking, and undertaking to loan the requisite balance of Rs. 19,000/- to the prospective customers. The offer was to be open for seven days and for 1000 bookings only.

3. The respondent - Shri Krishan Munjal of Hissar along with many others, was attracted by the offer, and in response thereto he duly deposited Rs. 6,150/- with the appellant-Company on the 11th December, 1989. Receipt No. 174 of even date (agreement No. 195) for the said amount, which included processing charges etc., was duly issued to him by the appellant-Comp















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top