SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.P.GUPTA, HEM CHAND
RAVINDER SINGH JAMWAL – Appellant
Versus
PREM NATH MOTORS PVT. LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V.P. Gupta, President—The complainant has claimed an amount of Rs. 1,10,000/- as compensation on account of physical and mental harassment caused to him due to the supply of a defective Car by the respondent. The complainant also prays that the Car be replaced by a new Car.

2. Briefly, the allegations are that the complainant booked a Car 'NE-118 Premier' with the Premier Automobile Ltd. Bombay, who was respondent No. 1 in the original petition.

3. The name of respondent No. 1 was deleted on September 21, 1990 and no relief is claimed by the petitioner against this respondent.

4. In this judgment, however, respondent No. 1 will mean the "Premier Automobiles Bombay" and respondent No. 2 will mean "M/s. Prem Nath Motors, New Delhi".

5. The respondent No. 1 sent an intimation regarding booking of a Car on 13.1.1987 and supplied the various particulars i.e. intimation No. and priority Nos. etc.

6. By Annexure-A dated 31.1.1987, the complainant was informed that his turn for delivery of Car was likely to mature by 2nd week of March, 1987 and he should send the choice of colour and Priority-cum-Intimation Card to the dealers within 2 weaks. The petitioner alleges that after compl











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top