A.S.VIJAYAKAR, Y.KRISHAN, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, RAIS AHMED
SYNCO TEXTILES PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GREAVES COTTON & COMPANY LTD. – Respondent
Mr. Justice V. Balakrishna Eradi, President—This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the Order of the State Commission, Rajasthan dated September 16, 1989 dismissing his complaint-petition on the ground that the appellant is not a 'consumer' within the meaning of Section 2(1)(d)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (herein after called ‘the Act’) inasmuch as the purchase of the goods in question had been made by him for a 'commercial purpose'.
2. The appellant company operates an oil mill to produce edible oils and oil cake from oil seeds. The plant and machinery in his factory are used for conversion of raw materials into finished goods. On August 19, 1986, the appellant purchased from the respondent company three generating sets for a total cost of Rs. 5,53,000/-. The grievance put forward in the complaint is that the generating sets supplied by the respondent company were found to be defective, in that one of the engines had an undersized crank shaft and the rubber rings (gaskets) used in the three generating sets were of inferior quality, as a consequence of which water had entered into the engines. Since correspondence with the respondent company for replacement
[No cases identified as bad law. None of the references indicate that any cited cases have been overruled, reversed, abrogated, or otherwise treated negatively as bad law.]
Rohit Chaudhary VS Vipul Ltd. - 2023 6 Supreme 317: Referenced as having "received the attention of the National Commission" in Synco Textiles Pvt. Ltd. vs. Greaves Cotton and Company Ltd., and "approved by this Court in Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta." The language "approved" explicitly indicates positive judicial treatment.
Vinit Bahri VS MGF Developers Ltd. - 2026 0 Supreme(SC) 124: States "This Court in Laxmi Engineering Works (supra) approved the view taken by the NCDRC in Synco Textiles Pvt. Ltd." The language "approved" explicitly indicates positive judicial treatment.
[No cases in this category. No explicit language such as "followed" appears.]
[No cases in this category. No language indicating distinction, criticism, or questioning appears.]
[None. All references contain clear positive treatment indicators via "approved," with no ambiguous language.]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.