SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, C.G.SETHU LAKSHMI, G.BALAGANGADHARAN NAIR
K. SIVASANKARAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
TRINITY TRUST – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice G. Balagangadharan Nair, President—The complainant is a creditor of the opposite party which is firm that was engaged inter alia in the business of lending money and raising loans, both on interests. The complainant's grievance is that he had deposited Rs. 1 lakh with the opposite party and that despite several demands, oral and written, it has not been repaid. He claims repayment of the amount with interest

2. In its version of the opposite party has pointed out inter alia that a petition I.P. of 11 of 1990 has been filed in the local Sub Court by a creditor to adjudicate the firm and its office bearers - partners - as insolvents and that it is still pending. At the hearing the representative of the opposite party also brought to our notice that the complainant himself has filed a suit of O.P. 761 of 1990 in the local Sub Court for recovery of the amount which is the subject of this complaint. This was admitted by Counsel for the complainant

3. Apart from the other objection raised by the opposite party, the pending of O.P. 761 of 1990 render the dispute subjudice and it would not be proper for this Commission to adjudicate on the same claim in this proceeding. The




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top