SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DAMODAR THANVI, SARIA KHAN, S.K.M.LODHA
ANIL KUMAR PAREEK – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL BOARD, SHAHPURA – Respondent


ORDER

S.K.M. Lodha, President –– Shri Anil Kumar Pareek sent the complaint by post which was received by the office on 20.3.1990. The dispute raised by the complainant in the complaint is with respect to plot No. 51 situate in Gandhipuri Residential Basti, Shahpura. He gave his bid in a public auction. He was the highest bidder. He gave the bid for Rs. 11,000/-. He has alleged that the plot was allotted to him. He is said to have deposited the balance of the auction money. The grievance of the complainant was that neither any patta was issued to him nor licence nor a document showing his ownership. After about two years he gathered from the opposite party orally that the plot in question had already been allotted to the persons belonging to the scheduled caste and as a result of that they had instituted a suit in a Civil Court which issued a temporary injunction restraining the opposite party from delivering its possession and to issue any document of title etc. He, therefore, sent the complaint by post claiming Rs. 3,85,000/- as compensation from the Municipal Board, Shahpura as detailed in Relief paras 1 to 5 of the complaint. In the subject of the complaint it is mentioned.

“NAGAR



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top