R.N.PANIGRAHI, J.PATNAIK, S.C.MOHAPATRA
MONISA SAMAL – Appellant
Versus
SAMBALPUR UNIVERSITY – Respondent
Mrs. J. Patnaik, Member — Complainant was a student of III year Degree course in Rourkela Science College affiliated to Sambalpur University. Her complaint is that she was not assigned one and same roll number in her examinations as per University rule. She was assigned 87-SH-17 R6 2 in Part II and Part III and 87-SH-17 R 111 in Part I examination. Furthermore, the roll number assigned to her in Part I examination was assigned to another student Shri S .K. Gupta for the same examination. 87-SH-17 R 62 was assigned to Shri P.K. Roul, another student of the college. Thus, two roll numbers were assigned to three students. Inspite of her repeated requests and of her father, University authority did not rectify the mistake. Part I examination of the III year Degree Course held later than II year. So she appeared in different roll numbers in Part I and her back paper examinations. Complainant apprehends that marks awarded to both students have been exchanged, because of identical roll numbers of the examinees. She has been given different mark sheets of College authority which enhances her apprehension. She produced true copy of mark sheets with identical roll number and some marks
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.