SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.PATNAIK, S.C.MOHAPATRA, R.N.PANIGRAHI
CHINTAMANI MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
TAHASILDAR, KHANDAPARA – Respondent


ORDER

S.C. Mohapatra, President ––– Deficiency in service to grant certified copies is the complaint by the complainant

2. Tahasildar, Khandapara is custodian of records of vesting case No. 1 of 1987 and O.P.L.R. Case No. 214 of 1959. Complainant filed copy application No. 881 of 1989 on 25.9.1989 to get certified copy of the order in vesting case No. 1 of 1987 and made such application No. 1071 on 19.12.1989 to get certified copy of order in O.P.L.R. Case No. 214 of 1959. It was indicated in the receipt that copy in Application No. 881 of 1989 shall be supplied on 30.9.1989 and in Application No. 1071 of 1989 that copy shall be supplied on 5.1.1990. Since copies were not supplied, complainant had to go from Cuttuck where he is serving to Khandapara about 16 times to come back disappointed. Complainant addressed petitions to Sub-Collector, Nayagarh who is the immediate Superior and controlling authority of Tahasildar and to Collector who is the next Superior authority and in overall charge of the district administration making grievance of non-availability of certified copies which were sent by registered post and have been received by them. In spite of it when each of the three offi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top