S.K.M.LODHA
GIRRAJ PRASAD TIKKIWAL – Appellant
Versus
RAM DEO SAINI – Respondent
S.K.M. Lodha, President ––– Shri Uttam Kumar Tikkiwal has submitted a writing that he is appearing as an authorised representative of the applicant.
2. At the request of the authorised representative of the applicant, this application has been placed before me.
Register it as a miscellaneous case.
Heard the authorised representative of the applicant at some length.
This is an application for transfer of Complaint Case No. 68/91 from the District Forum, Tonk, to any other District Forum of Rajasthan.
Eighteen complaints under S. 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act” herein) were filed by separate complainants against the applicant (opposite party before the District Forum, Tonk). They are pending trial before the District Forum, Tonk. The above referred complaint is one of them.
3. The applicant has alleged that the complaint against him was filed mentioning him as proprietor of Laxmi Trading Company. It has been averred in the application for transfer that the complaints were filed on the advice of Shri Ajeet Singh Ex. M.L.A., owner and proprietor of Palace Hotel. The complaints were filed by suppressing true facts on the “Sajish ayom Salah” of the proprietor and employ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.