SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANGALORE
Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.G. Desai, President;
Sri K.R. Ramaswamy Iyengar & Smt. Sudha V. Reddy, Members.
VINAYAKA AGENCIES & ANR.—Appellants
versus
D.N. SRIDHAR.—Respondent
Appeal Nos. 48 & 49/1991—Decided on 24.6.1991

A person who has not paid for a product or service cannot be considered a consumer and may not have their complaint entertained under consumer protection laws.

Headnote:

Consumer Protection - LPG Connection - The court held that the complainant, who had not paid anything for the LPG connection, could not be considered a consumer and his complaint could not be entertained. The court also advised the Indian Oil Corporation to send intimation of allotment of LPG connection by registered post.

Fact of the Case:

Mr. D.N. Sridhar registered for LPG connection but did not receive the intimation letter. He filed a complaint before the District Forum, which directed the Agent and Indian Oil Corporation to give him a new LPG connection and pay costs.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the complainant, who had not paid anything for the LPG connection, could not be considered a consumer, and his complaint could not be entertained. The court set aside the order passed by the District Forum and dismissed the complaint, but advised the Indian Oil Corporation to consider afresh the request of the complainant for the LPG connection.

Issues: The main issue was whether the complainant, who had not paid for the LPG connection, could be considered a consumer and have his complaint entertained.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the complainant, by merely registering for the LPG connection without paying anything, could not be considered a consumer and his complaint could not be entertained.

Final Decision: Both the appeals were allowed, the order passed by the District Forum was set aside, and the complaint was dismissed. The court directed the parties to bear their own costs.

ORDER

R.G. Desai, President ––– These two appeals arises out of an order passed by the District Forum, Bangalore in Complaint No. 5 on its file.

2. They arise in this way :

Mr. D.N. Sridhar (R-1 in Both appeals) had registered for LPG connection on 23.3.1987 with Vinayaka Agencies, Bangalore. When he made enquiries, he was informed that an intimation letter was sent to him on 12.11.87 under Certificate of Posting. According to him, he did not receive that intimation. When he approached the Zonal Manager of the Indian Oil Corporation, he refused to allot the LPG connection. Hence, he filed a complaint before the District Forum.

3. The Indian Oil Corporation resisted the complaint by contending inter-alia that since the complainant had failed to take connection within 15 days from 12.11.1987, they cannot give him connection out of turn. The District Forum, after hearing the parties directed the Agent and Indian Oil Corporation to give new LPG connection to the complainant within a month from the date of the receipt of the order and to pay costs of Rs. 100/-. Being aggrieved by the said order, the Agent, Vinayaka Agencies has filed Appeal No. 48/91 and the Indian Oil Corporation has filed an Appeal No. 49/1991.

4. Respondent No. 1 who is present, admits that he had not paid anything either to the agent or the Indian Oil Corporation while registering for LPG connection. By merely registering, he will not be a consumer. He has neither purchased goods for consideration nor hired the services of the appellants for consideration. Hence, he will not be a consumer and his complaint could not have been entertained by the District Forum. Hence, the order passed by the District Forum cannot be sustained.

5. Before operating with the appeals, we would like to observe that the Indian Oil Corporation will do well to send the intimation of allotment of LPG connection by registered post instead of sending it under Certificate of Posting.

6. In the result, both the appeals are allowed and the order passed by the District Forum is set aside and the complaint is dismissed. However, the Indian Commission observes that the Indian Oil Corporation will do well if it considers afresh the request of Respondent No.1 and allot him LPG connection as his turn has already reached. Under the circumstances, we direct the Parties to bear their own costs.

Appeals allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top