SARIA KHAN, S.K.M.LODHA
ARUNA SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
TEXLA TELEVISION, JUPITER RADIO (REGD. ) – Respondent
S.K.M. Lodha, President -–– This appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act” herein) is directed against the order dated 10.7.1990 passed by the District Forum, Jaipur in Complainant Case No. 453/90 by which the complaint was dismissed.
2. The complainant-appellant purchased a colour T.V. Texla, Model No. 2042 III Sr. No. 32019 on 20.2.1985 vide Cash Memo No. 22 dated 20.2.1985 from M/s Venus Electronics, Katewa Mansion. Shastri Nagar, Jaipur a dealer of Texla T.V. under the distributorship of M/s Avantika, 24, Jayanti Market, Jaipur which closed the shop long back. It is said that the T.V. was defective from the date of its purchase, inasmuch as its colour contrast was very poor and picture was not bright. This defect was reported to the dealer immediately who sent his technician 2-3 times but its performance could not improve. The dealer is said to have replied that the colour contrast; will automatically improve and it will give better and pleasant picture with the lapse of time. The complainant relied on the assurance. He approached M/s Avantika for rectification of defect in T.V. set. M/s Avantika sent its technician who failed to rectify the de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.