SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, BASANTI DEVI
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
R. K. KESWANI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. M.B. Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Naresh Katyal, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice S.S. Sandhawalia, J.—The true import of the first exclusionary clause of Hospitalisation and Domiciliary Hospitalisation Benefit Policy (MED-I-CLAIM) of the National Insurance Company Limited is the solitary but very significant question in this appeal.

2. The respondent Dr. R.K. Keswani is a distinguished professional who retired as the Professor and Head of the Department of Surgery and Director of Medical College Rohtak. He took out a Hospitalisation and Domiciliary Hospitalisation Benefit Policy of the appellant company for a period of one year from the 6th of March, 1990 to the 5th of March, 1991. In the original proposal from Dr. Keswani with total candour expressly and prominently mentioned that he was a chronic patient of Ischemic Heart Disease from 1969 to 1990 and had received treatment from Dr. S.C. Sachdeva, Professor of Medical College, Rohtak and was not fully cured of the same. The proposal form of the complainat-respondent was accepted and he made a payment of Rs. 1,350/- as the annual premium which was duly received and the relevant policy issued in his favour.

3. After more than four months of the commencement of the said policy Dr. Keswani develope



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top