SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.G.DESAI, K.R.RAMASWAMY IYENGAR, SUDHA V.REDDY
MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
R. S. BANNIMATTI – Respondent


ORDER

K.R. Ramaswamy Iyengar, Member—The allegations made in complaint are as follows: —

The complainants are agriculturists of Holalu Village in Bellary District and Haranagiri Village in Dharwar District. They grow various agricultural produce including hybrid seeds. The opponents are engaged in the supply of foundation seeds to various crops. The Opponent No. 1 which is a branch of Opponent No. 2 sold Bajra foundation seeds bearing Code No. B-276 to the complainants for the purposes of raising Bajra Hybrid seeds. The complainants sowed the seeds in their irrigated lands in accordance with the direction and instructions given by the opponents and their representatives and raised the crops by spending Rs. 2,500/- per acre. The seeds were sown in the second week of June, 1990 and the crops became ripe for harvesting in the third week of September, 1990. But it was found that due to inadequate release of pollens from the male flowers, there was complete failure of grain setting in the female earheads. As a result of which the yield was less than one quintal per acre as against not less that 12 quintals per acre, if there had been sufficient release of pollens. The inadequate yield was






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top