G.G.LONEY, ATANASIO MONTEIRO, SUBHALAKSHIMI NAIK
MARUTI UDYOG LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M. S. HAMEED, PANAJI – Respondent
Mr. Justice G.G. Loney, President — This is an appeal against the order the District Forum, Panaji, dated 14.8.1991 passed in complaint No. 62 of 1991.
2. The complainant, Shri M.S. Hameed approached the District Forum with the complaint that the Maruti Motor Car purchased by him on 2.11.1990 was having the defect in break system. He alleged that inspite of repeated complaints, the defect was not rectified by the Opposite Parties. The complainant, further, alleged that he had gone to Trivandrum on tour and got his vehicle checked through other various authorised service stations, still the defect was not removed. He, further, alleged that when he returned to Goa, he took his vehicle to the Opposite Party No. 1 who is the authorised dealer of M/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd., for attending the break system. According to the complainant, even theme the break system could not be rectified. Complainant had obtained a letter from Mr. Gavin Fernandes, Works Manager, of Opposite Party No. 1 expressing his inability on 15.1.1991. The complainant, then, took up the matter to Opposite Party No. 2, M/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd., who in turn stated that the matter has been referred to Bombay Office. Ultima
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.