SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.S.YADAV, Y.KRISHAN, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, A.S.VIJAYAKAR
S. PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
S. D. O. (PHONES) – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner: In person.
For the Respondent:Shri V.K. Dhawan, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice V. Balakrishna Eradi, President — This Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated September 26, 1991 passed by the State Commission, Lucknow allowing Appeal No. 70/S C/91 filed before it by the first respondent herein — S.D.O. (Phones), Rampur Garden, Bareilly — and setting aside the order of the District Forum, Bareilly dated January 19, 1989 allowing the complaint petition filed by the revision petitioner to the extent of directing the Opposite Party to adjust the excess amount of Rs. 282.80 demanded in two telephone bills against two other pending bills due by the complainant and to collect Rs. 2.20 from the complainant in full and final settlement of the latter bills and thereafter to restore the complainant’s telephone connection immediately.

2. The revision petitioner who was the complainant in the case had approached the District Forum with the grievance that certain telephone bills served on her were incorrect and excessive and that the action taken by the respondent in disconnecting her telephone on the ground of nonpayment of the excess amount was illegal and improper. The District Forum, Bareilly after hearing both sides passed an order subs

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top