SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, A.S.VIJAYAKAR, Y.KRISHAN, B.S.YADAV
PANALAL – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Complainant :Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Advocate.
For the Opp. Party : None.

ORDER

Mr. Y. Krishan, Member—The complaint is that Opposite Party No. 4 (Chief Manager, Bank of India, Pune, Main Branch) has wrongfully, negligently and unauthorisedly made payments totalling Rs. 25,59,000/- on the 3rd, 4th & 5th of May, 1990 on the authority of one of the partners resulting in debit balance in the two cash credit accounts of the partnership firm with the Bank.

1. The complainant Panalal Khemchand Shah is one of the two partners in the firm M/s. Khemchand Dayaljee & Sons. The cash credit accounts of the firm with the Bank were being operated by either of the parmers individually on behalf of the partnership firm. The Complainant informed the bank by a telegram and telex on 3rd of May, 1990 that there were differences among the two partners and that bank should not make payment of the Cheques of the Firm without joint signatures of the partners thereon. The complainant followed it with a confirmatory letter on the 4th of May, 1990. The telegram and the telex of 3rd of May, 1990 were delivered to the Opposite Party No. 4 on the 4th of May, 1990 and the confirmatory letter of 4th of May, 1990 was delivered to the Opposite Party on 5th of May, 1990.

2. The complainant ha














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top