SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ELLEN DHARKAR, G.G.LONEY, M.G.GAVAI
ELECTROMEK MARKETING – Appellant
Versus
SUMADHUR ENTERPRISES – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice G.G. Loney, President—Both these appeals are decided by this common order as a common question of law arises in these appeals. We have heard Shri V.V. Marathe, Advocate from Solapur in both the appeals and Shri Satpute, Representative of Akhil Bharatiya Grahak Panchayat for both the respondents.

2. Shortly stated, the facts in both the cases are that the appellant Electromek Marketing is the local dealer at Solapur for distribution and sale of “Deep Freezers manufactured by Reliance Incorporation, 26, Appollo Industrial Estate, Ground floor, Mahakali Cross Rd., Chakala, Andheri (E), Bombay. It is the complaint of both the complainants i.e. M/s. Sumadhur Enterprises and Arvind Indapure that the deep freezers purchased by them from appellant Electromek Marketing were defective. Both the deep freezers were manufactured by the Reliance Incorporation, Bombay. The complainant alleged that the Deep Freezers purchased by them were defective goods, and, therefore, they approached the District Forum, Solapur for the refund of the purchase price of the respective deep freezers with interest and also claimed the amount for compensation, as mentioned in their respective complain






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top