Mr. Justice D.R. Vithal Rao, President—The complainant and his Learned Counsel are present. The complainant has filed his affidavit swearing to the facts averred in the complaint. Neither the Learned Counsel for the respondent nor the respondent is present. The Respondent and his Learned Counsel were also absent for the hearing on 17.12.1991. Even on this day, when the matter was called on for hearing the Learned Counsel for the respondent and the respondent are absent.

2. We have perused the averments made in the complaint and the affidavit of the complainant and also the documents produced by the complainant i.e., the advertisement that had appeared in Indian Auto Magazine as per Exhibit C-l, advertisement that had appeared in English daily newspaper ‘Deccan Herald’ dated 4th July, 1989 as per Exhibit C-2, the specification of the engine as referred to in the owner’s handbook as per Exhibit C-3 and also the voucher for having paid the price of the vehicle as per Exhibit C-4 along with its letter sent by the respondent on 3-1-1991 as per Exhibit C-5. We have also perused the statement of objection filed by the respondent and document, that is, certificate dated 17.9.1991 produ