Mr. Justice Mitra, J.—In this Revisional Application the petitioners have challenged, inter alia, the order dated 26th March, 1991 passed by the President, Calcutta District Forum under the Consumers Protection Act, 1986 in C.D.F. Case No. 2045 of 1991 and also the order dated 5th April, 1991, passed by the President, State COMMISSION, under the said Act, in SC Case No. 256 of 1991, inter alia, on the ground of jurisdiction of both the aforesaid Tribunals in passing the respective orders.

2. The case as made out by the petitioners in the Revisional application inter alia, is that the opposite party No. 1 lodged a complaint before the President, Calcutta District Forum under the Consumers Protection Act, 1986 giving rise to CDF Case No. 2045 of 1991 inter alia, for the following reliefs:—

(a) To pass an order directing the writ Petitioners to show cause as to why they should not be directed to grant permit to the opposite party No. 1 on the route Calcutta to Jalpaiguri via. Barasat, Beharampur, Malda, Raiganj and Siliguri, having Long Route Conductor Licence, under Section 30 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988;

(b) After hearing both the parties to direct the writ petitioners to gran