SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

POTHURI VENKATESWARA RAO, LAKSHMANA RAO
STATION SUPERINTENDENT – Appellant
Versus
B. V. S. SUBRAMANYAM – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. C. Ramakrishna S.C., Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice Lakshmana Rao, President—This appeal is preferred against the order of the District Forum, Cuddapah in C.D. No; 279 of 1991 dated 7-9-1991 directing the appellants to pay. Rs. 591.00 (Rupees Five hundred and Ninety-one only) to the respondent within one month from the dale of receipt of the order with costs of Rs. 100-00. The respondent booked house-hold articles on 30-6-1991 at Kaikalur for delivery at Cuddapah. The Railway authorities has delivered the goods on 15-7-1991 at Cuddapah.

2. The case of the respondent was that he approached the Railway authorities at Cuddapah Railway Station every day for (14) days from 1-6-1991 and spent Rs. 20.00 on each day towards Auto-rickshaw charges. It was further suited that he had been to renigunta Railway Station once for taking delivery of articles and that the railway authorities did not delivery the articles. Having regard to the delay in delivery and the amounts spent by the respondent, the District Forum, Cuddapah directed payment of Rs. 391-00 towards actual expenses incurred by the respondent; and Rs. 200.00 towards compensation apart from Rs. 100-00 towards costs.

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top