SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.N.MITTAL, B.L.ANAND
GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
AMAR SINGH JAIN – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Janendra Lal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. R.K. Mittal, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice R.N. Mittal, President—This appeal has been filed by the opposite party No. 2 against the order of District Forum dated 3.4.1992 by which the warranty period of the sealed unit of the Godrej Refrigerator was extended by three years w.e.f. 3.5.92.

2. Briefly the facts are that Sh. Amar Singh, complainant respondent No. 1 purchased a Godrej Refrigerator on 17.2.1987 from opposite party no. 1-respondent No. 2 and it was delivered to him on 4.3.1987. It was covered under 12 months warranty by the appellant followed by a four years of service contract. Respondent No. 1 opted for four years additional guarantee by paying extra amount to respondent No. 2. Thus, respondent No. 1 became entitled to a warranty for five years w.e.f. 4th March, 1987.

3. The refrigerator started giving trouble to respondent No. 1 after two months of its purchase. It was repaired by the appellant first on 5.6.1987 and again on 3rd June, 1988. The sealed unit was thereafter replaced by the appellant on 31.10.88. The replaced sealed unit was defective and it was again replaced on 29.5.1989. It did not work properly even thereafter. The third sealed unit was replaced on 7.2.91. Even then it did not w














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top